Prikolu topiks
06. Jūlijs 2010, 16:42
Nez, kuri mūsu politiķi varētu būt šeit intervēti?:
TV: "Congratulations Prime Minister. Before we start, as we stand here on Thursday afternoon, do you accept that tomorrow will be Friday?"
PM: "We have always supported the standard structure of the calendar and acknowledge that the public expect a regular system that provides the rhythm necessary for everyday planning and life structures. We feel very strongly about this."
TV: "So you do agree that tomorrow is Friday?"
PM: "It isn`t important whether it is Friday or Monday. What is important is that unexpected changes don`t interfere with the normal expectations of the public - and this government has a solid record in supporting those expectations."
TV: "But as today is Thursday, surely you can confirm that tomorrow is Friday?"
PM: "Everything is relative and whether the next day is Wednesday or Sunday is dependent on where you stand at the time. We have never challenged the current system and have the full support of the unions on this. Most intelligent people agree that changes are not required."
TV: "Well then, what day is tomorrow?"
PM: "Tomorrow is the next day in our plan to further develop our marvelous country in many areas. We plan to continue providing better health care, reduced debt, reduced unemployment, controlled immigration and to be a world leader in controlling global warming."
TV: "Returning to the question, can you not confirm that Friday is tomorrow?"
PM: "Friday is always around. It has been around many times before and will be around again many more times. Which is why we need – as a responsible government - to plan and organise for the future. Not just for tomorrow, but for our children and their children.
TV: "Prime Minister, the viewers are waiting for your answer on what day you think tomorrow is?"
PM: "We are dealing with bigger issues here. The Friday, Saturday, Sunday thing is not important or relevant to the scheme of things. They need to understand the critical issues and focus on the matters of concern, such as the condition of our nation and how we can continue to develop it so that all may reap the benefit."
TV: "I`m sorry, we seem to have lost the point here again. Are you saying that it isn`t Friday tomorrow?"
PM: "The reality is that it is not important what day it is. What is important is how we handle the situation - and my government is handling it with solid policies evolved from the mandate the people gave us."
TV: "But we just want to know if you agree that it will be Friday tomorrow?"
PM: "Let`s remain focused here. It is the nation that is important and we stand fast and rock steady in our dedication to the job in hand. In closing, let me say this one more time - we are fully committed to the task and have commissioned a report that will enable us to develop the plans for the future. Thank you."
TV: "Prime Minister?????????????..."
TV: "Congratulations Prime Minister. Before we start, as we stand here on Thursday afternoon, do you accept that tomorrow will be Friday?"
PM: "We have always supported the standard structure of the calendar and acknowledge that the public expect a regular system that provides the rhythm necessary for everyday planning and life structures. We feel very strongly about this."
TV: "So you do agree that tomorrow is Friday?"
PM: "It isn`t important whether it is Friday or Monday. What is important is that unexpected changes don`t interfere with the normal expectations of the public - and this government has a solid record in supporting those expectations."
TV: "But as today is Thursday, surely you can confirm that tomorrow is Friday?"
PM: "Everything is relative and whether the next day is Wednesday or Sunday is dependent on where you stand at the time. We have never challenged the current system and have the full support of the unions on this. Most intelligent people agree that changes are not required."
TV: "Well then, what day is tomorrow?"
PM: "Tomorrow is the next day in our plan to further develop our marvelous country in many areas. We plan to continue providing better health care, reduced debt, reduced unemployment, controlled immigration and to be a world leader in controlling global warming."
TV: "Returning to the question, can you not confirm that Friday is tomorrow?"
PM: "Friday is always around. It has been around many times before and will be around again many more times. Which is why we need – as a responsible government - to plan and organise for the future. Not just for tomorrow, but for our children and their children.
TV: "Prime Minister, the viewers are waiting for your answer on what day you think tomorrow is?"
PM: "We are dealing with bigger issues here. The Friday, Saturday, Sunday thing is not important or relevant to the scheme of things. They need to understand the critical issues and focus on the matters of concern, such as the condition of our nation and how we can continue to develop it so that all may reap the benefit."
TV: "I`m sorry, we seem to have lost the point here again. Are you saying that it isn`t Friday tomorrow?"
PM: "The reality is that it is not important what day it is. What is important is how we handle the situation - and my government is handling it with solid policies evolved from the mandate the people gave us."
TV: "But we just want to know if you agree that it will be Friday tomorrow?"
PM: "Let`s remain focused here. It is the nation that is important and we stand fast and rock steady in our dedication to the job in hand. In closing, let me say this one more time - we are fully committed to the task and have commissioned a report that will enable us to develop the plans for the future. Thank you."
TV: "Prime Minister?????????????..."
Prikolu topiks
06. Jūlijs 2010, 16:45
.gif ":)")
Prikolu topiks
06. Jūlijs 2010, 17:50
Somnevajusj, chto xotj kto-to iz nashix politikov znajet anglijskij na takom urovne, chtobi tak obojti konkretnij otvet na takoj konkretnij vopros 
pri etom vse vremja chto-to govoritj, i v to zhe vremja nichego ne skazatj
pri etom vse vremja chto-to govoritj, i v to zhe vremja nichego ne skazatj
Prikolu topiks
06. Augusts 2010, 00:16
In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance.
The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet. It`s funny, as well as informative:
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God`s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination... End of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God`s Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can`t I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don`t agree. Can you settle this? Are there `degrees` of abomination?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn`t we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I`m confident you can help.
Thank you again for reminding us that God`s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan.
James M. Kauffman, Ed.D.
Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia
(It would be a damn shame if we couldn`t own a Canadian
The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, penned by a US resident, which was posted on the Internet. It`s funny, as well as informative:
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God`s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination... End of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God`s Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can`t I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don`t agree. Can you settle this? Are there `degrees` of abomination?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn`t we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I`m confident you can help.
Thank you again for reminding us that God`s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan.
James M. Kauffman, Ed.D.
Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia
(It would be a damn shame if we couldn`t own a Canadian
Prikolu topiks
13. Augusts 2010, 18:45
Tiem, kam ir problēmas vai atrunas ar slinkumu par pareizu valodu forumos un foruma lasītāju dīvainām reakcijām saistībā ar uzrakstīto — viela pārdomām:
An English professor wrote these words on the chalkboard: "A woman without her man is nothing" and asked his students to punctuate it correctly.
All of the males in the class wrote: "A woman, without her man, is nothing."
Are you ready for this...........?
All the females in the class wrote: "A woman: without her, man is nothing."
Punctuation is powerful.
An English professor wrote these words on the chalkboard: "A woman without her man is nothing" and asked his students to punctuate it correctly.
All of the males in the class wrote: "A woman, without her man, is nothing."
Are you ready for this...........?
All the females in the class wrote: "A woman: without her, man is nothing."
Punctuation is powerful.
Prikolu topiks
25. Augusts 2010, 18:51
Klasika
Prikolu topiks
25. Augusts 2010, 20:44
Šī ir pati pirmā sērija no videokasetes, kura man mājās vēl joprojām stāv
Prikolu topiks
25. Augusts 2010, 20:47
Tā arī ir 1. sērija Avārijas Brigādei.25 August 2010 21:44:46 garix rakstīja:
Šī ir pati pirmā sērija no videokasetes, kura man mājās vēl joprojām stāv